F.Y.I.
Saturday, January 5, 2013
HYDE PARK ON HUDSON
F.Y.I.
Springwood Estate in Hyde Park, NY (about 70 miles south of
Albany) was the birthplace and lifelong home of FDR. He often stayed there as a
vacation getaway even while serving as President.
PRINCIPAL
CAST MEMBERS
Laura Linney: Margaret Suckley, distant relative of FDR
Elizabeth Wilson: the President’s mother Sara Ann
Bill Murray: Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 32nd
President of the United States
Olivia Williams: the First Lady Eleanor
Samuel West: King George VI “Bertie”
Olivia Colmand: Queen Elizabeth
Elizabeth Marvel: Marguerite Missy LeHand, the President’s
secretary
REVIEW
What a missed opportunity: rather than depicting FDR as a
powerful man who was instrumental in getting the USA out of the Great
Depression and the one who led the country to becoming the super power it is
today, he is shown as nothing more than a womanizer. If we were looking for another
example of immoral behaviour we could pick up a copy of the National Enquirer, that trashy American tabloid found at check-out
counters.
Another serious shortcoming is that very little is said
about the circumstances for the visit by British royalty (the first ever) just
months before war broke out in Europe and even less about the American political
situation and the constraints imposed on FDR by the populace, both significant,
both totally underdeveloped and both virtually ignored.
Case in point: FDR and the King are alone in his study
having after-dinner drinks and instead of discussing the real reasons for the
visit they spend their time blathering on about their respective handicaps and
women.
Production values are first-rate but that is not reason
enough to waste your time on this clunker.
CLASSIFICATION
FOR
NITPICKERS ONLY
Although FDR wore rimless Pince-nez eyeglasses they were
never perched on the end of his nose in such a jaunty manner.
The King and Queen are shown arriving at Springwood Estate
being greeted by FDR sitting in front of the porch steps. In fact, the King and
Queen after several days spent in Washington, DC accompanied FDR and Eleanor on
the drive up to Hyde Park.
According to King George’s handwritten notes the Prime
Minister of Canada, McKenzie King took part in the first conversation with the
President but he is never even mentioned.
King George goes on to say they discussed “matters of
extreme importance” not the light banter depicted in the movie.
The red telephone on FDR’s desk was a secure communication
line first established in 1963 during the Cold War between the White House and
the Soviet Union, some 23 years after these events took place.
Friday, January 4, 2013
RUST AND BONES
Original title De rouille et d’os
In French with English subtitles
PRINCIPAL
CAST MEMBERS
Matthias Schoenaerts: a mid 20’s single father Ali
Armand Verdure: his 5-year-old son Sam
Corinne Masiero: Ali’s sister Anna
Marion Cotillard: Stéphanie, trainer at Marineworld
Céline Sallette: her best friend Louise
REVIEW
The screen story is choppy and could do with a rewrite. Case in point:
Ali sees a woman smoking and says something to the effect “nice day isn’t it?”
and the next scene is a close-up of them making love. Like where’s the rest of
that encounter?
Speaking of sex, it strikes me that the love ‘em and
leave ‘em, wham/bam thank you ma’am-type encounters coupled with the extended
violent brutal fights serve only to justify the R rating and not advance the
story in a meaningful way. Furthermore the film is too long at two hours. Next
time they should hire a competent screen editor.
And there are many inexplicable situations that make no
sense, that defy logic. For example why does Stéphanie call Ali of all people
whom she’s only known for half an hour at most? And once she gets to know him better
why continue the relationship with such an irresponsible, inconsiderate,
uneducated, boorish man? Surely she can do better! It simply does not ring
true.
There is only one reason to see the movie: to experience the
wonderful performance of Cotillard yourself. Other than that, there is nothing
else of any redeeming value to it.
CLASSIFICATION
P.S.
Something got lost in translation: there is no literal
reference to either rust or bones. Perhaps it’s meant in a philosophical
manner?
Monday, December 31, 2012
TROUBLE WITH THE CURVE
PRINCIPAL
CAST MEMBERS
Clint Eastwood: aging baseball scout Gus Lobel
John Goodman: his boss Pete Klein
Robert Patrick: team owner Vince
Matthew Lillard: his assistant Tom Silver
Amy Adams: Gus’s daughter Mickey
Justin Timeberlake: rival team’s scout Johnny Flanagan
Joe Massingill: hot high school player Bo Gentry
REVIEW
For the totally dedicated baseball fan who can’t get enough
of the game this one is a winner. For the rest of us it is very much a “déjà-vu
movie” following a proven formula to the point there is no doubt about the
outcome, much less what transpires prior to that.
However even with all its shortcomings, it is entertaining
and enjoyable, something that cannot be said for a lot of offerings out there.
Sunday, December 30, 2012
2012 Top Ten + Two
There’s always hope: that’s the message we take away after
seeing this small scale film about the on-going situation in the Gaza strip, an
area surrounded by Israel. The acting is uniformly good and the story is a credible one
taking time to portray the contrasts such as rich/poor, freedom/confinement,
Jew/Arab. I know which side I’d pick.

A slightly altered version of the events that took place in
Iran with the taking hostage of American diplomatic personnel in 1978 does not
diminish the impact of the rescue attempt. Careful attention to period detail and great acting bring the
events to life. Even knowing the actual outcome, the tension is palpable as you
can never be sure how Hollywood will handle the facts. Riveting stuff.

Set in the South two years before the American Civil War
this story about a slave is not for everyone. Despite some terrific acting,
great cinematography, lots of humorous situations, some hilarious dialogue with
a twist for the dramatic the unremitting violence will be too much for many. Although some of the violence is almost cartoonish what with
all the blood spatters and too much gore, some of it definitely is not. The squeamish
like me will have to avert their eyes more than a couple times. And some
movie-goers will be offended with the frequent use of the “N” word. Another thing: it’s long. Real long. It runs for 2 hours and 25 minutes, time some people do not have for a movie. However, given that this is definitely a “Quentin Tarantino
film” those who enjoy his work will relish every moment of it.

Expectations are high any time there is a movie with Denzel Washington in it: this time he really nails it giving what is probably his best performance. Because the role calls for him to handle a variety of human emotions it’s to his credit he never goes over the top, something lesser actors constantly do. But he is not the only one who puts in a terrific performance; it’s just that he’s the best. Although flying has a lot to do with the movie storyline it’s the human side of things that make it interesting. Questions of morals and ethics abound and that makes for good ol’ fashioned solid entertainment. Despite the fact the running time is in excess of two hours, it is not a minute too long. One movie goer put it this way: “the movie is never too long when Denzel Washington is in it”.
Brilliant. No other term comes close to describing Meryl
Streep’s portrayal of a woman who is unhappy with her marriage of some
thirty-odd years. Not that the other two principals are slouches, it’s just
that she is so much better than they are. The story will resonate with anyone who has been (or still
is) in a long term relationship. There is a ring of truth about it and it does
not feel fake. Perhaps one of the writer’s went through this or knows someone
who did? Clearly geared to the more discerning viewer, one moviegoer so
succinctly put it this way: “an interesting movie that caters to a more
senior demographic although parts of it made me cringe” because of the explicit
and graphic nature of some scenes. Most people will feel the same, being
uncomfortable hearing others talk about their intimate personal sex life.
However, like me, you can always look away if it becomes too much. But more
often than not there is some comic relief, either a titter or a chuckle from
someone.

Worthy of an Academy award, the performance by Day-Lewis is but one of many fine character impersonations this film has to offer. It also provides an insight to Lincoln’s interpersonal skills with people and his clear-sighted judgment in face of a terrible dilemma: end slavery or end the war. Lincoln accomplished more in the last four months of his life than most people do in a lifetime. It can be a bit confusing at times while trying to follow the House discussions (more like a yelling match than debate) and understanding the implications of the back room makeovers not to forget the under-the-table deals to outwit his opponents but the effort is worthwhile in order to get the gist of it. (My full review includes important background information.) Production values are first rate and the score by John Williams is one of his best. At 2 hours and 30 minutes it is not a minute too long given that the story being told is such an important one.

There are more than a few chuckles and laughs in the telling of this rather unusual story including the premise itself of sport fishing in the desert. The acting is first rate and some of the scenery is pretty impressive. It is thoroughly entertaining even though the British accent keeps you on your toes so as not to miss any of the dialogue. In the words of one movie-goer “it’s a charming gem of a movie with almost unbelievable challenges facing them with great acting by all the principals”.

Unlike most movies of this sort, this one is not aimed at
the younger crowd. With some serious issues, it is anything but fluff. In fact,
some scenes are difficult to watch as they are that real.
With a strong storyline and some great acting by Cooper and
Lawrence (De Niro too) it is at times funny, inspiring, unsettling and
engaging. That makes for a strong contender for recognition of some sort, maybe
at the time they give out the Academy Awards?
The action sequences are nothing short of spectacular with some of the “traditional” elements clearly in evidence (think fruit stands) which pretty well sums up this latest version of the series: a mix of the old and the new. Beautiful locations which are a trademark of the series include Istanbul, London, Shanghai, Macau and the Scottish Highlands. The beautiful girls (another Bond staple) are there as well. The acting is uniformly good with less tongue-in-cheek than in some earlier editions. To me, this is the best Bond yet in part because of the strong cast along with the work of Sam Mendes as Director and Roger Deakins in charge of cinematography. Although a tad long at 2 hours and 23 minutes, there are very few slow spots that could be left on the editing floor.
The film takes place over a 24 hour period while former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher is clearing out her husband's belongings. Her life unfolds through a series of flashbacks sometimes with actual period television footage. It’s a huge undertaking as it covers almost her entire life chronologically from when she was a teenager at the outbreak of WWII up to the year 2005. The producers have wisely chosen not to dwell too long on any of the key events that took place during her career. To have done so would have resulted in a film three or four times longer than it is and who wants that? Another good choice is to have Meryl Streep portray the Prime Minister. Streep's performance is nothing short of remarkable. She really nailed it this time, not only in the voice (and accent) but with the mannerisms and facial expressions. Streep holds the record for the most Academy Award nominations of any actor, having been nominated sixteen times. There is no doubt in my mind she will up that count by one. Production values are top notch including costume design, set decoration, makeup (the best I’ve seen in years) and cinemaphotography all contributing to its elegant look.
The discriminating viewer will be rewarded with learning more about a charismatic world-class leader who was faced with having to decide between personal happiness and her people. During the first fifteen minutes or so the movie jumps back and forth in time but these flashbacks serve only to confuse the issue since at that stage we are not yet familiar with the characters on screen. But apart from that, the film has so much going for it: great acting, beautiful cinematography, excellent pacing, a well written story and a lovely score. Although the running time is just over two hours, it is not a minute too long as this is one film with a lot to say and that should not be rushed.
This latest IMAX documentary covers some very familiar ground: global warming and the daily struggle just to survive in this harsh environment. By focusing on a mother polar bear and her twin seven-month-old cubs their plight becomes evident but the solutions are not. Meryl Streep narrates with feeling and Sir Paul McCartney has written some new songs that almost overwhelm the viewer. But not quite, as the majestic landscape draws our attention to what is indeed a serious problem. Although the producers have avoided including anything of a gory nature, that does not mean to say the film is without some sense of pending doom. By contrast, the cubs provide more than a few moments of levity so it’s a nice balance.
Saturday, December 29, 2012
DJANGO UNCHAINED
Western drama
PRINCIPAL
CAST MEMBERS
Jamie Foxx: Django, a slave
Christoph Waltz: Dr. King Schultz, a dentist
Leonardo DiCaprio: plantation owner Calvin J. Candie
Samuel L. Jackson: Candie’s trusted head slave Stephen
Kerry Washington: Broomhilda Von Shaft, a slave
REVIEW
Set in the South two years before the American Civil War
this story about a slave is not for everyone. Despite some terrific acting,
great cinematography, lots of humorous situations, some hilarious dialogue and a twist for the dramatic the unremitting violence will be too much for many.
Although some of the violence is almost cartoonish what with
all the blood spatters and too much gore, some of it definitely is not. The
squeamish like me will have to avert their eyes more than a couple times. And
some movie-goers will be offended with the frequent use of the “N” word.
Another thing: it’s long. Real long. It runs for 2 hours and 25 minutes, time some people do not have for a movie.
However, given that this is definitely a “Quentin Tarantino
film” those who enjoy his work will relish every moment of it.
CLASSIFICATION
FOR
NITPICKERS ONLY
- While camping two horses are a short distance away from Dr. Shultz but then the camera cuts to a close-up and now one horse is directly behind him.
- On the way to see Candie, one of his henchmen angers Django so he pulls on the saddle resulting in both rider and horse falling to the ground. In a medium shot we see the henchman struggling to get up but the horse is standing there like nothing happened.
- As Django and Dr. Schultz approach Candie’s villa, the long shadows of the entranceway sweep across the path in front of them. But when they stop in front of the porch steps the shadows are short, like those seen around noon.
- While talking with Candie, Django and his horse are in a different location from one shot to another, sometimes besides the horses pulling Dr. Schultz’ wagon, sometimes back beside it.
- Dynamite is used a couple of times throughout the movie but it did not exist when these events took place. The Swedish chemist Alfred Nobel took out a patent for his new invention in 1867.
- One of the slave drivers is wearing a Confederate style kipi hat, some 2 years before the outbreak of the American Civil War in 1861 when they were first issued.
P.S.
Friday, December 21, 2012
LIFE OF PI
PRINCIPAL
CAST MEMBERS
Irrfan Khan: middle-aged Piscine “Pi” Molitor Patel
Rafe Spall: a Canadian author
Ayush Tandon: Pi as the 11-year-old son
Adil Hussein: Pi’s father Santosh, owner of a zoo
Tabu: Pi’s mother Gita
Suraj Sharma: 16-year-old Pi
REVIEW
To my mind movies told in
flashback many times take away the essence of the story by telling us the
ending so I don’t know why they do it so often. Case in point: before we even
learn about the epic struggle of Pi as a teenager, we know he survives. So the
key element is gone. I wish I had missed the first fifteen minutes because this
is really a simple story about survival with frequent references to
spirituality thrown in.
Despite some beautiful images they
only serve to break up the monotony during the second half of the movie and do
nothing to move the narrative along. Consequently it is over two hours long and
overstays its welcome by at least 20 minutes.
However the director seems to have
switched gears somewhere because the ending is told without any visual
references at all and that’s where they could have helped in telling the story.
How odd.
CLASSIFICATION
Thursday, December 13, 2012
HITCHCOCK
Drama
F.Y.I.
Alfred Joseph Hitchcock (August 1899 – April 1980) was a
film director and producer who pioneered many techniques in the suspense and
psychological thriller genres. He was first to have the camera move to mimic a
person’s gaze, and often framed shots to maximise anxiety, fear or empathy. His
innovative film editing and twist endings made for engaging entertainment as
did his cameo appearances in his own film.
PRINCIPAL
CAST MEMBERS
Anthony Hopkins: Alfred “Hitch” Hitchcock
Helen Mirren: his wife and collaborator Alma
Toni Collette: Hitch’s assistant Peggy
Danny Huston: screenwriter Whitfield “Whit” Cook
Jessica Biel: actress Vera Miles
Scarlett Johansson: actress Janet Leigh
James D’Arcy: actor Anthony Perkins
REVIEW
Having already met with much success, Hitch wanted to make a
horror movie but encountered a lot of resistance. How he overcomes these obstacles
and at the same time deals with his troubled marriage makes for an interesting
look at one of the most influential filmmakers of the last century. Both
Hopkins and Mirren put in wonderful performances which makes it all that more
real.
But the infrequent appearance of a ghostly figure of the
killer in conversation with Hitch seems out of place. There are better ways
than that to provide revealing insights to his thoughts that are not so
intrusive.
CLASSIFICATION
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)























